TECHNET Archives

February 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:17:23 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Cheers, Werner! I guess that cleared the air a bit, but I wonder from where
the Old Wive's Tale originated if it isn't true(?) I have read quite a few
articles that refer to the brittle nature of intermetallic compound layers.
In products where the operating environment is fairly benign, the IMC layer
can probably be as thick as the entire solder joint without failing. Solder
joints on Class 3 boards, however, operating in environments where
temperature cycling and vibration are normal, do, in my experience, suffer
higher fracture rates in older age, often either through the IMC layer or
on its border. For that reason, I argue against applying more heat to a
board than is totally necessary.

Peter



[log in to unmask]      18/02/2003 02:27 PM

              To:  DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST Aero/ST Group@ST Domain, [log in to unmask]
              cc:
              Subject: Re: [TN]








Hi Peter,
You repeat what I regard as an unsubstantiated old-wives-tale: "Time and
temperature increase the thickness of the brittle intermetallic layer that
is
the solder joint, rendering the solder joints increasingly susceptible to
fracture."
In all my years in this business, I have never seen a SJ failure caused by
'too thick' an IMC layer. Of course, IMC layer thickness will increase with

time and temperature, but (1) IMCs--with the exceptions of AuSn and AgSn
IMCs--are much stronger than solder even though they are brittle; I have
NEVER seen a fracture in the IMC. (2) It takes long exposures of about 150
hours at 155C--I have seen the results from up to 1,000 hours at 155C
[TUMunich & TI]--to get to thicknesses I would get concerned about, and not

so muchabout the IMC layer but the structure of what is left of the SJ.
I certainly would agree that eposure to elevated T's of PCAs should be as
imited as possible, but nnot because of concerns for the SJs.

Werner Engelmaier




[This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you.]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2