TECHNET Archives

January 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 18:58:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Rick,

Are you sure you have the correct standards to measure a thin deposit of immersion gold? You can not use hard gols
standards on your x-ray fluorescence to measure immersion gold.  Also, electroless nickel must be measured with
electroless nickel standards. Call your x-ray fluoresence equipment manufacturer for help, and also toalk to the
immersion gold supplier for advice on measuring such a low thickness.  Our experience is that immersion gold is
difficult to accurately measure. Also, a deposit of 3 to 9 microinches should be visibly good coverage. 1 to 1.5
microinchs should be visually poor coverage, which is reason for rejection. If  the coverage looks visually good, then
I would doubt that it is really as low as 1 to 1.5 inches thick.

Rick Thompson wrote:

> We have an overseas board supplier that is supplying an immersion gold
> finished board that is only 1-1.5 microinches of gold over 100 microinches
> of nickel.  I believe this may be too thin a gold layer for adequate
> protection of the nickel but don't have any objective evidence for this.
> Can anybody give me any feedback or other information sources that might
> support this?  IPC-2221 specifies approximately 3-9 microinches of gold
> which is what we generally require, but I'm looking for additional objective
> evidence for requiring thicker gold deposits.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rick Thompson
>
> Sr. SMT Process Engineer
> SMTEK International, Inc.
> +1 (805) 532-2800
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2