Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:02:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> We have been purchasing PCB Assemblies from a sister plant. Recently we
> have noticed quality issues on these assemblies and are working through
> the acceptance / rejection criteria. The IPC manuals are a great source.
>
> Our question comes from the fact the while inspecting the assemblies to
> IPC 610 Class II (Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies ), we have
> noticed quality issues on the bare pcb ( not related to Assy processes )
> that are not covered by IPC 610 so we have utilized IPC 600 (
> Acceptability of Printed Boards). We realize that typically bare board
> quality issues should be found at incoming inspection of the bare boards,
> but when they are not is it still acceptable to reject the assembly due to
> reduced trace width or other reject able criteria on the pcb in IPC 600.
> If so, what level of magnification should be used.
> IPC 610 - allows a referee upto to 20 X magnification for a specific
> technology
> IPC 600 - allows a referee upto 40X for some criteria.
> Can 40 X be used for pcb issues unrelated to the assembly process ?
> Appreciate your inputs
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|