DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

August 2002

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:33:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, "Alexis Meehan <[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I would like to know if there are folks out there who are regularly
using blind/buried vias or via-in-pad technology.
* What is your experience (sucessful or not successful)?
* What is the minimum hole size you are using?
* What are the cost increase or savings at the fab level and
also the assembly/rework level?
I want to get real-world feedback from those who have experience with
this. Thanks in advance for any info you can provide.

********************
Alexis Meehan
PCB CAD Mgr.
408-328-4595
[log in to unmask]
570 Maude Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
http://www.luxn.com
LuxN - The Optical Renaissance has begun!(tm)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2