TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 7 May 2002 11:53:15 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Peter/All Concerned:
- Re exposed copper.  Not a problem per 600, A-610 or J-STD-001.  Exposed
copper just turns green and as soon as the surface is protected from the
environment by the coating, the oxidation/tarnishing stops.  There has been
some conjecture that exposed copper would lead to metal migration, but as far
as I know neither DOD or anyone else has found a smoking gun to indicate that
this has ever caused or contributed to a field failure.
- History Lesson:  Once upon a time DOD had a bad problem with exposed
Kovar/Alloy-42 (being iron based alloys they kept oxidizing and eventually
would result in an open circuit when the lead rusted away from the solder)
[bad things happen to a Naval or Marine Corp. airplane and onboard systems in
a perpetual salt-fog environment].  Consequently, DOD prohibited exposed
Kovar/Alloy 42.  During one revision of the Mil-Specs the DOD contractors
cried hard times and got the requirement for optimum inspection lighting
(centered at 3000K, e.g. quartz halogen) deleted (cost too much to have a
good light).  Without the broad color spectrum available with optimum
lighting it is difficult or impossible to differentiate between exposed
Kova/Alloy 42 and exposed copper, so DOD simply said "no exposed basis
metal", and didn't really worry about exposed copper.  For a while industry
standards/specifications mimicked the DOD requirement for no exposed basis
metal.  Eventually someone figured out why the Mil-Stds said no exposed basis
metal and then the requirement was dropped.   Recent industry specifications
and standards require neither optimum lighting or (in some cases)
magnification aids.
- Exposed copper (on lead ends and the vertical sections edges of circuit
traces/pads/etc.) should not be considered a problem (as far as I know no
failure mode is/has-been associated with exposed copper).   Exposed copper
due to mechanical, thermal, or chemical attack is another kettle of fish and
must be examined on a case-by-case basis to determine if it constitutes a
defect.
Cheers, Jim Moffitt, Moffitt Consulting Services, Noblesville IN

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2