TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 30 May 2002 17:22:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
The only danger I see is injection of unwanted potential into the mat. A GFI
(Ground Fault Interrupt) on the equipment circuit would eliminate that
possibility and is a good practice anyway. "Common" ground in some old
factories may have significant voltage potential. The GFI will trip under
those conditions, drive maintenance crazy for a little while, but it will
prevent EOS damage caused by the conditions that your old policy attempts to
prevent.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jim Jenkins
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:26 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] ESD and equipment isolation
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> One of our internal specifications states that processing
> equipment needs to
> be "electrically isolated" from the static dissipative mat.  We are
> interpreting this to mean that if the equipment has a metal case it is not
> allowed to be in contact with the mat.  There has been some
> controversy over
> this, because we have whole areas and labs that have test equipment and
> other items that do not have the little feet on the bottom and
> make contact
> with the mat.
>
> We have people arguing on both sides here.  Some say that the contact
> provides a direct path to ground taking out the resistance needed to slow
> down the discharge.  I say that the dissipative (rather than conductive)
> nature of the mat provides the necessary resistance.  That is why
> resistors
> are no longer required in ESD specifications.
>
> Others say that the equipment can inject electrical energy through the mat
> into the ESDS devices.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim Jenkins
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2