TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Seth Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 20 May 2002 15:34:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Bill,

I agree with you on all of this.  Perhaps my post wasn't clear.  I was
giving reasons why one should _never_ solder a crimped connection.  There
are crimped connections and there are soldered connections.  Anything that
is both is generally a failure waiting to happen.  The last part about
telling the design engineer (that's me) "Because" when he asked "Why" was me
just being a smart ass to this mostly production oriented forum.  The line
about the 200 lb. Muskie was supposed to tip people off that I was kidding,
but I guess it didn't work.  We do have some big Muskie's here in Wisconsin
(at least that's what some of my lying fisherman friends tell me; I've never
caught one), but they don't outweigh us.

You can post this if you think others may have been misled by my message.

Regards,

Seth Goodman
Goodman Associates, LLC
tel 608.833.9933
fax 608.833.9966


> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Kasprzak, Bill (sys)
> USX
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Crimped connections
>
>
> Seth,
>
> I know I sound like a broken record but,
>
> crimping is just that, crimping. If you find it necessary to add solder or
> even compelled to add solder, then change your connection from a crimp
> design to a solder design. So, all these consequential results such as
> wicking causing loss of strain relief and the entrapment of flux cannot be
> part of the equation when the connection was designed to be
> crimped, period.
> I still maintain that if the connection that being made is supposed to be
> crimped, then crimp it and be done with it. No other secondary processes
> need to added. Otherwise, skip the crimping and just solder the wire. You
> should not do both.
>
> Bill Kasprzak
> Moog Inc. Manufacturing Engineering, Electronics

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2