TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Misner, Bruce" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 17 May 2002 12:09:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I have a CM that precision spray coats UR with an x-y programmable gantry
system.  They would like to avoid coating large areas of the board that have
no components but DOES have conductors covered by solder mask over bare
copper. The boards are all Class 3,  4 layers, some designs Tin/lead plate
finish, some solder dipped finish, some .062 thk, some .125 thick.

They are requesting a change of wording on the drawing to read: Coat all
components, leads, solder joints and exposed circuitry per J-Std-001.  Does
anyone have serious concerns with this approach?

Bruce Misner

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2