TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2002 10:20:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Provided all ball size and coplanarity issues are relatively good, no paste
is best. If using paste, ensure the micro stencil thickness is as specified
over the entire foil or whatever material. Ensure the stencil is placed
accurately and located "permanently", with tape or tool system, until paste
dispensation has been properly effected. Doesn't hurt to look at paste
depositions under scope to get a good "feel" for consistency.

No paste is best as there is plenty of solder volume from balls. Going below
.8mm pitch is another story - sometimes. Of course, be sure specified pad
sizes are as required - relative to ball size. No solder bridging should be
apparent whatever the attachment method. Good profiles don't hurt either -
and on it continues.

MoonMan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2