TECHNET Archives

July 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:43:09 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Lou.

I used to have the solder pot tested on a quarterly basis, and the only change I had to make
was to add extra tin once. All the other contaminants remained stable.

Steve.

"Tempea, Ioan" wrote:

> Hi Lou,
>
> we are doing it on a quarterly basis for as long as I can remember and I
> didn't notice any significant difference between each set of results. All
> the contaminants are very low each time. And we passed all the ISO audits.
>
> Frankly, I think that twice a year is not a bad idea.
>
> Regards,
> Ioan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lou Hart [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:54 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      [TN] Wave solder pot analysis
> >
> > TechNetters, I'd appreciate comments on contaminant analysis of a wave
> > solder pot.  We had been sending a sample out for analysis (type "C" I
> > think it is, by the mil spec) once per month.  Now the solder supplier is
> > telling me that once every six months is more than enough.  I've been
> > taking the contaminant data and plotting Q charts (for short-run SPC the
> > modern way, as I've been mentioning in this forum) with the monthly data.
> >  What has been your practice and recommendation?
> >
> > At the moment, it is hard for me to feel comfortable with a twice-yearly
> > analysis of what seems to me to be an important material in our
> > manufacturing process.  Lou Hart
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> > Technet NOMAIL
> > Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> > E-mail Archives
> > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> > additional
> > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> > ext.5315
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2