TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Solder Pot Analysis
From:
Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 18 May 2001 16:31:14 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (211 bytes) , TEXT.htm (579 bytes) 
What is the most reliable method of solder pot analysis?  I know the Keister uses the spark analysis and Alpha uses a wet chemistry method (I think).  What are the differences and which is more reliable?

TIA

Kathy




<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT: 10pt Haettenschweiler; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px">
<DIV>What is the most reliable method of solder pot analysis?&nbsp; I know the
Keister uses the spark analysis and Alpha uses a wet chemistry method (I
think).&nbsp; What are the differences and which is more reliable?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>TIA</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Kathy</DIV></BODY></HTML>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2