TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 1 May 2001 11:57:15 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Daan:

Suspect that Auger analysis (This is pronounced like the name of the famous
basketball star who was tried for murder....OJ) may be the best approach.

The problem with Auger is that it may be too sensitive, as it picks up every
atom on the surface, and there is a trace of almost every element on most
surfaces, so to compensate for this, I recommend you doing Auger on both the
suspect area, as well as a "clean" area, and comparing the results.

This is typically done in labs dedicated to this, and the charge is per hour,
with a minimum charge.  I can tell you where to get this done on the West
Coast of the US, but cannot assist for Europe.

Hope this helps.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2