TECHNET Archives

March 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:32:29 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
You mean IPC-6012, right? Table 3-2 it sounds like. I don't see that
requirement listed in the IPC-A-600.
We're a fab, not an assembler, but I've heard of significant reliability
problems with holes having less than .0007 (18 micron) copper in them. I
would stick to the spec. (My $.02)
Tim Reeves

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Ashley Allen Shepard [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
|Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:49 AM
|Subject: Exception to IPC-A-600 Class II minimum via wall plating
|
|
|Hi All,
|
|I'm wondering if anyone has data they'd be willing to share
|supporting the
|18 micron minimum (class I and II) Final Finish, Surface
|Plating Coating
|Requirements in the IPC-A-600 specification.  Specifically,
|I'm interested
|in the effects of reducing via wall plating thickness. Any information
|would be greatly appreciated.
|

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2