 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:41 -0600 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes it is a reject, a fracture is a fracture. How could you assure that the fracture wouldn't continue to get worse over time? Another thought, how can you be assured that what you see is actually the full extent of the issue?
Kathy
>>> [log in to unmask] 02/27/01 09:56AM >>>
Hi Technetters,
It is stated in IPC-A-610C that a fractured joint is considered defect in all classes. Can anyone
confirm that it would be the same if the fracture is on the component side? And why should
it be considered as defect if the joint on the secondary side is good. Would the fracture
extend from the primary side to the secondary side?
Thanks in advance...
JF
WABTEC CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
The content contained in this e-mail transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named herein. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT: 8pt Arial; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px">
<DIV><FONT size=1>Yes it is a reject, a fracture is a fracture. How could
you assure that the fracture wouldn't continue to get worse over time?
Another thought, how can you be assured that what you see is actually the full
extent of the issue?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>Kathy</FONT><BR><BR>>>> [log in to unmask]
02/27/01 09:56AM >>><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>Hi
Technetters,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>It is stated in
IPC-A-610C that a fractured joint is considered defect in all classes. Can
anyone</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>confirm that it
would be the same if the fracture is on the component side? And why
should</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>it be considered as
defect if the joint on the secondary side is good. Would the
fracture</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>extend from the
primary side to the secondary side?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=323035115-27022001>Thanks in
advance...</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=323035115-27022001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=323035115-27022001>JF</SPAN></FONT></DIV><CODE><FONT size=3><BR><BR>WABTEC
CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE<BR>The content contained in this e-mail
transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named herein. If the reader of this
transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this transmission is strictly
prohibited.<BR></FONT></CODE></BODY></HTML>
|
|
|
