IPC-600-6012 Archives

January 2001

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Eccles <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>, Bill Eccles <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:22:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Loose fibers would define frayed.
The photograph clearly showes loose fibers.
Therefore the boards are rejected as per IPC 600F- class 1,2,3 non
conformance, "frayed" with loose burrs.

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 Mail Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
John Perry
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Nonconforming Condition for Nonmetallic Burrs?


Hi All,


Got an issue here raised by one of our IPC-A-600F users.  The attached .pdf
contains a photograph that shows the board edge of a sample which the user
believes does not pass the criteria established in section 2.1.1.1.,
Nonmetallic Burrs.  It would appear as though the router had some problems
on the edges and fiberglass fibers are now falling off the edges.

Does this provide sufficient information in order to obtain a consensus from
this group on the pass/fail issue?


Best Regards,




John Perry
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, Il 60062
1-847-790-5318 (P)
1-847-509-9798 (F)
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2