IPC-600-6012 Archives

January 2001

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Sundquist, Ken" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>, Sundquist, Ken
Date:
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:25:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
 To all, the application of end product will determine reject/acceptance
based on fit, form function. Also, need to assure magnification per IPC.

regards - Ken


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Perry [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 4:16 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [IPC-600-6012] Nonconforming Condition for Nonmetallic
> Burrs?
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> Got an issue here raised by one of our IPC-A-600F users.  The attached
> .pdf contains a photograph that shows the board edge of a sample which the
> user believes does not pass the criteria established in section 2.1.1.1.,
> Nonmetallic Burrs.  It would appear as though the router had some problems
> on the edges and fiberglass fibers are now falling off the edges.
>
> Does this provide sufficient information in order to obtain a consensus
> from this group on the pass/fail issue?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
>
> John Perry
> Technical Project Manager
> IPC
> 2215 Sanders Road
> Northbrook, Il 60062
> 1-847-790-5318 (P)
> 1-847-509-9798 (F)
> [log in to unmask]
>  << File: Loose f1.pdf >>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2