IPC-600-6012 Archives

January 2001

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"W. Glenn Colescott" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:59:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In my humble opinion, the board does not meet the criteria.  However, I agree
with the comments about making the magnification the same as the IPC standard.
If the IPC standard is to be the referee, the magnification must be the same.

I'm not in complete agreement with the form, fit, and function comments.  If
this part is used in a product with a display, keyboard, or backlighting, we
have had problems with loose fibers getting into the customer "view" area.  If
the final customer can see the defect, this edge is an absolute failure.  If the
board is used inside a closed box, there is more forgiveness in the roughness of
the edge.

I hope the board is blanked or punched.  If this is a routed board, there are
serious problems with the process parameters.

Thanks,

W. Glenn Colescott

Component Engineer, PCBs & FPCs
Delphi Delco Electronics Systems
One Corporate Center  -  Mail Station R117
P.O. Box 9005
Kokomo, IN 46904-9005
Phone;  (765)-451-1258   FAX;  (765)-451-9647
Internet ID; [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2