TECHNET Archives

August 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:56:05 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
In a message dated 8/23/00 10:30:27 AM US Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

<< Has anyone got any recommendations for a no-clean rework flux that is safe
 (reliable) to leave on a board (even if it hasn't been subjected to a
 thermal excursion above reflow temperature)? >>

I don't believe that there is such an animal, unless you consider good old
RMA a "No Clean", which many people do.  All "no Clean" fluxes that I have
ever tested, experimented with, or read data for have a basic requirement of
completing a thermal excursion to make them "inactive" to use a simple term.

Jon Moore

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2