Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:56:05 EDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 8/23/00 10:30:27 AM US Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
<< Has anyone got any recommendations for a no-clean rework flux that is safe
(reliable) to leave on a board (even if it hasn't been subjected to a
thermal excursion above reflow temperature)? >>
I don't believe that there is such an animal, unless you consider good old
RMA a "No Clean", which many people do. All "no Clean" fluxes that I have
ever tested, experimented with, or read data for have a basic requirement of
completing a thermal excursion to make them "inactive" to use a simple term.
Jon Moore
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################
|
|
|