TECHNET Archives

May 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 29 May 2000 09:59:15 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (95 lines)
Have to agree with 2221, Glenn ,
2.5 um would be just about a practical minimum (we have internal 5.0 min,
1year store) .
Your algebra is fine .

If you'd like to halve that ; you'd have to go to some of the denser/even
plating technologies , 'm just starting to unravel (validate) the potentials
.

check http://www.pulseplating.com ,

Moti should be able to help you

paul

ps
if you'd keep it JIT (or close),
with short storage the lowered Ni & Au deposits would become less critical .
Than, in conjunction with denser plate, 1umNi & .3umAu should hold you
safely,
with up to 1/2 year in good store prior assembly, in my estimate .
Once assembled , you should have no worries .
Would be interested in Andy's opinion on new plating rigs myself,
will forward you one of his copper dendrites notes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Pelkey [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, 26 May 2000 10:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Nickel Thickness on Flex


Hi all,

        What would you recommend as a minimum thickness for Nickel plating
on
a flex circuit?

        We have specified 150 uin followed by 30 uin gold on top and sides
of
conductors to prevent copper electrochemical migration.  This has worked.
However, we may have to reduce this requirement to meet a supplier's
capability.  I looked up the specification information in IPC-6013 and got
min
40 uin (Class 1), 50 uin (Class 2 and 3).  Same thing in IPC-2221 except
there's a statement in para 4.4.5 that says "...It is an effective barrier
layer (when its thickness exceeds 2.5 um) which prevents the diffusion of
copper into gold."
        I calculate the 2.5 um to be approx. 100 uin, which is what many
have
said in searching the archives.  My thoughts are along the line if copper
can
migrate into the gold, than it can reach the surface and have the potential
of
creating the dendritic short.
        So, now I'm stuck.  Would you say 100 uin Ni is O.K.?  What about
70,
or 50?

Thanks for your help.

Glenn

P.S.  I don't have IPC-2223.  Would somebody mind checking the numbers there
for me?

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2