TECHNET Archives

May 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:31:58 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Hey, Paul!
Now you got me scared. I hoped that Hals und Beinbruch was for good chance. You write
about multiple passes, -in short, the process is time related. Do I have to fear that
if the test takes a long time, I might damage good parts?
Thanks,
Gaby

Paul Klasek wrote:

> Take it from you Werner, glad you pull from golf to see us;
>
> 3D machine's orbiting view can see cracks from substrate,
> with the kind human or inhuman experience you and Jerry noted;
> with metal tops it could be still a hazy vision at the best ?
> The likelihood of high efficiency top sinks (metal)
> increasing popularity seems logical, to me (deluded or not),
> meaning to be very interesting for multilayered patients diagnosis?
>
> Did you come across damage factors on X pass repetitions ?,
> i know in med you can burn the bone with multipasses,
> (know cases with 4-6 pass wrist X burns);
> with the intensities required through the metal tops,
> if they are Xable,
> (wonder what's Altera's view on X,seen somebuddy here on Net,please,)
> would there be a possibility of internal damage of ever finer paths ?
>
> I realize this is commercially sensitive laundry,
> hints are good enough answers
> (even no comment, come to think of it)
>
> paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, 1 June 2000 10:17
> To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] To X-ray or Not to X-ray.
>
> Hi Paul, Steve & others,
> It all depends on your volume and the level of assurance you need/want.
> There
> is no question that for some people's operation spending that kind of money
> is overkill, on the other hand there is no question that X-ray inspection
> with the proper recognition algorithm(s) and settings can improve the
> quality
> of the outgoing solder joints better than any other technique.
> Werner Engelmaier
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2