I am told that many folks are still using MIL-P-55110D 'cause "E" was
terrible and succeeding documents "PRF", "IPC" and others were not
sufficiently good enough for space equipment. That is what I hear, wrong or
right.
Ron Dieselberg

-----Original Message-----
From: Wanner Bernhard [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 14:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] AW: [TN] MIL-P-55110



        >               (...) Even tho the notice came out "canceled for new
designs" there are many

        >       new designs using that spec number.
I would be interest to hear about how many "new" MIL-contracts are refering
to MIL-PRF55110 and how many to IPC-6012.
Bernhard

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################