I am told that many folks are still using MIL-P-55110D 'cause "E" was terrible and succeeding documents "PRF", "IPC" and others were not sufficiently good enough for space equipment. That is what I hear, wrong or right. Ron Dieselberg -----Original Message----- From: Wanner Bernhard [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 14:56 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [TN] AW: [TN] MIL-P-55110 > (...) Even tho the notice came out "canceled for new designs" there are many > new designs using that spec number. I would be interest to hear about how many "new" MIL-contracts are refering to MIL-PRF55110 and how many to IPC-6012. Bernhard ############################################################## TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c ############################################################## To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body: To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET ############################################################## Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information. If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5365 ##############################################################