TGASIA Archives

January 2009

TGAsia@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Asia Committe Task Group Forum <[log in to unmask]>, LP Koay <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:24:54 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (481 bytes) , text/html (2620 bytes) , flux classification detail.doc (156 kB)
Hi, 

 

I would like to have better understanding on the different between old
classifications with existing classification of the flux type. The old
classification is R, RMA, etc. Existing classification is showed in
table below (copy from IPC-J-STD 004A). Example question is RMA flux
same as ROL0? I am not able to find section 5.2 and 5.3 for further
detail from the document. Does anyone familiar with the classification
of both system and their relationship? Thanks! 

 

Regards,

LP



ATOM RSS1 RSS2