TGASIA Archives

September 2008

TGAsia@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
NG ENG GUAN <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Asia Committe Task Group Forum <[log in to unmask]>, NG ENG GUAN <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:33:12 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1206 bytes) , text/html (10 kB)
Hi Leo,

 

No doubt , this is caused by the flux. We had faced the same problem before
.Our solution is to clean up the flux.  

 

From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leo Yang
Sent: 26 September 2008 13:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TGAsia] ת·¢: The effect of Flux residue on PCB
Importance: High

 

FYI

 

 

B/R

Leo Yang

IPC WOFE

21-54973435-616

  _____  

From: charles.lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:51 AM
To: 'Asia Committe Task Group Forum'
Subject: The effect of Flux residue on PCB

 

Dear All,

 

Our customer complained us that flux residue resulted in dielectric
resistance reduction between two pads on PCB (From 10Mohm to 3Kohm), please
refer to the attached picture.

The flux we have been using is No-clean type supplied by Union Soltek.

 

We are now puzzled with below questions:

1)     What is the chemical substance around these two pads? Is it only flux
residue?

2)     Will the flux residue be able to occur chemical reaction with solder
mask after elapse of a long time?

3)     What is the root cause which results in dielecric resistance
variance?

 

We look forward to your expertised explaination, thanks!

 

Best reagrds

Charles Lee

 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2