TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u2Yeg-00006jC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 01:31 CST
Encoding:
9 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 28 Mar 96 08:38:24 CST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 29 08:
18:00 1996
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3192
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Tf_HQ.0.769.H7vMn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Nancy Nelson" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Is there a Standard amount of Test Point Coverage at the PCB Bare 
Board Supplier during Electrical Test in which an NRE setup and 
100% Electrical Test of PCB's was charged.

What is the chance of Escape associated with Electrical Test?

Thanks in advance for any help given.

[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2