TECHNET Archives

April 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:29:34 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Woolley, Mark D. (Mark)" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: No-Clean Flux
From:
"Woolley, Mark D. (Mark)" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
The cored fluxes should present no issue because they are in contact with the solder.  The temperature required to melt the solder dies well in deactivating the flux.
mark


mark
Mark Woolley |PTRL Laboratory | Avaya | 1300 West 120th Ave | Westminster, CO 80234  USA |
Voice (Lab): (303) 538-2166 | email: [log in to unmask] |


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Blair Hogg
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:04 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] No-Clean Flux

While we are on this thread, how does no-clean flux cored solder wire work for activating the residues sufficiently?

Thanks,

Blair

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2