TECHNET Archives

November 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)
Date:
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:04:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
I agree with you.  610 is about workmanship, not configuration
management.
Look at Paragraph 1.1 Scope (quoting from Rev. D here): "... nor is it
intended 
to authorize repair/modification or change of the customer's product."

610 also references IPC-T-50, which defines what "repair" means.

-Joe


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin Glidden
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 1:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Rework Requires Approval & Vehement Tech


OK, for ANYONE operating in the hi-rel industry, it is widely known and
accepted that assemblies may be reworked without customer approval, but
all
repairs require customer approval. Some customers / programs do not even
grant any MRB authority to the vendor.  Now, my company is an OEM.  We
are
not a contract MFR.  However, we had a case of a PCB with a via that was
non-functional.  A tech wanted to just install a short jumper through
the
via to re-establish the connection.  Myself and another tech argued this
was
a REPAIR and as such required customer approval.  The tech in favor of
the
jumper argues that jumpers are covered by 610, and therefore allowed.
My
rebuttal to this was jumpers are covered not as an implication they are
ok
in a repair situation, but to give guidance as to how they should be
made if
part of original design intent or part of an authorized repair.   He is
now
vehemently arguing that unless I can show him where in any IPC standard
it
says repair requires customer approval, then I am wrong.  Alas, I cannot
find it.  Does such a statement exist?  My suspicion is that the answer
lies
in the contract paperwork for the part, not an IPC document, but if
anyone
knows it does exist, and can point me to it, I would be MOST
appreciative..
Kevin Glidden

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2