Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2007 10:35:31 +0300 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Werner,
If class 1 is accepting 50% filling of through holes with solder and
class 3 is accepting full PTH, I hope you agree that the solder joints
strength are not the same?
What I wanted to clarify, is that with lead free process, beside the
known failures such whiskers, lifted pads etc., the DOA / short terms
failures are mostly bad solder joints (SMT and through holes) happened
because the small process window (PCB and components finish type / i.e
short storage / shelf life and hi peak temperature).
I have seen lot of reliability tests evaluation of Lead free including
life cycles, talking about the difference between the alloys. I didn't
see lot of tests evaluation dealing about the bad solder joints / low
yield happened because the small process window.
Best Regards
Reuven ROKAH
e mail: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] RoHS compliant laptop with early failure
Hi Reuven,
Actually, it is not quality but inadequate or non-existant DfR [design
for
Reliability]. Solder joints are subject to the same creep-fatigue
whether they
are Class 1 or Class 3-the difference may be that the operational
environment
may-may- be more severe for Class 3 product. But I have seen Class 1, or
more
accurately Class 0 (Class minus 1?) [unsupported holes] in automotive
under-the-hood environments.
Werner
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|