 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uvTEb-0000NvC; Tue, 27 Aug 96 13:51 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 96 11:28:06 EST |
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Aug 27 14: |
21:46 1996 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"tceR-.0.neI.qEq8o"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe this changed quite sometime back. You could submit foil lam
provided you met peel strength values. I even had my Group B done
along with this peel strength test.
Someone from one of the independent labs may shed some more light
on this than I can.
DHH
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Military spec interpretation
Author: [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK-HADCO
Date: 8/27/96 1:58 PM
When producing multi layer PCBs to MIL-P-55110 we have historically used a
"cap" build.,as the
interpretation was that to use a "foil" build we would have to get approval
under MIL-P-13949,a laminate
spec.. Is this the general concensus or are people using foil builds against
the 55110 spec??
Regards
Paul Greene
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
