TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 May 2013 19:05:04 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I have a rhetorical question.

The bromine compounds in FR4 are bound by covalent bonds into the epoxy 
structure and are theoretically harmless, at least until they reach 
decomposition temperature.

Filler materials may have sulfur bound into their molecules either 
covalently or ionically, but always another relatively small molecule 
which is not integral in the epoxy structure.

Surely, these two cases cannot be considered as similar???

Brian

On 07.05.2013 15:46, Victor Hernandez wrote:
> Fellow TechNetters:
>
>     We are doing some preliminary investigation of solder mask and have found out that it contains low levels of sulfur.   Not sure what sulfur constituents.   Is This a typical finding of sulfur?
>
> Victor,
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2