TECHNET Archives

April 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:32:06 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
You mean time above solidus. Time above liquidus is vapor. 
Yes, 105 degrees in liquidus does seem excessive, but it depends on the size/mass of the CCA being soldered. It might be required for very large CCAs.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fabien Guizelin
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 6:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Max time above liquidus

Hi,
Should I be concerned by excessive TAL ?   (inter-metalic, etc)
Do you consider 105sec TAL with a Indium 5.1 paste excessive ?   (Indium recommends 45-60sec)
Thanks,
Fabien



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2