 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 03 Jul 1996 10:56:23 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"TPliT1.0.feD.T1fsn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ubTlm-0000FEC; Wed, 3 Jul 96 10:23 CDT |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 3 10: |
41:16 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey technetters!
I was wondering, does anyone out there have experience with
ultrasonics? Specifically, we are looking into the possibility of acquiring
an ultrasonic stencil cleaner for SMT screens contaminated with low
residue paste.
Could anyone out there give me reasons why ultrasonics are or are not
worth the expense?
Thanks!
-Dirk Bellamy
MFG Eng, Current Electronics Inc.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
