TECHNET Archives

August 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:54:27 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi Ed! Argon is a better blanketing gas due to density but Nitrogen is much
lower in cost and works adequately enough that it is favored by industry.
Bev's stuff covered the toxic and reactive issues associated with CO2.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I didn't find a good answer for why N2 was chosen as an inert gas for
> soldering purposes. Why not CO2 or Argon?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Popielarski
> Engineering Manager
>
> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
>                                970 NE 21st Ct.
>                               Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
>                               Ph: 360-675-1322
>                               Fx: 206-624-0695
>                               Cl: 360-544-2289
>
>
>
>        "It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and
> cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast,
> the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design."
> https://goo.gl/maps/mMjg43rXeFB2
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2