TECHNET Archives

August 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dan R. Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:02:41 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1476 bytes) , text/html (2308 bytes)
I'm hoping some tech-net metallurgist/alchemist or other wizardly type can help me with this.

I had a stray thought this weekend and can't seem to find the flaw in my logic.
Here is how the thought process went;
-Copper oxidizes and must be coated to maintain solderability.
-Certain copper alloy's remain solderable even after long term storage and exposure to hand oils etc. (i.e.;alloy 752)
-Why isn't a corrosion resistant alloy used in the manufacture of PCB's?

I know the electrical resistance is higher for alloy's but it seems this could be compensated for the same as trace resistance is now, just get a new set of numbers.

What am I missing, this is really driving me nuts.

Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2