 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sbZyO-0000GeC; Thu, 27 Jul 95 15:56 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!starman.convex.com!ondricek> |
| Date: |
Thu, 27 Jul 95 15:44:57 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"x23x-1.0.e16.Zr_5m"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
26:44 1996 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'd like to get some feedback on what other people are using for pad and
antipad sizes relative to finished hole size on press fit holes.
Thanks in advance,
Doug Ondricek
Convex Computer Corporation
Ph: (214) 497-4794
Fax:(214) 497-4441
email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
