TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t1F83-0000H8C; Fri, 6 Oct 95 10:56 CDT
Encoding:
30 Text
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!pcsmtp.lcec.lockheed.com!sethier>
Date:
Fri, 06 Oct 95 10:46:40 EST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1305
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
01:16 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"T9ZBz2.0.7TA.X5LTm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"ETHIER_SA" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
     
     We are having some problems soldering to an electroless gold over 
     nickel card.  specifics are:
     
     5-10 microinches electroless gold over 20 microinches electroless 
     nickel.  .020 thick double sided smt card being soldered in a nitrogen 
     covection reflow oven. components range from 0603-1206 passives, sot 
     23 devices, and a 25 mil ssop. 
     
     Soldering is being done using Alpha 609 water soluble 63/37 paste with 
     a fairly standard profile.
     
     Results thus far are that the joints are granular, cold appearing, 
     with marginal wetting to both card and components.  There are also 
     numerous occurrances of voids/pinholes eminating from the lead pad 
     interface.
     
     Any insights would be helpful in the areas of:
     
                Profiles
                Pastes
                Methods for checking incoming solderability of the cards.
                Any thoughts on optimal gold/nickel characteristics
     
     Thanks for the help.
     
     Steve Ethier
     Mgr. New Product Engineering
     Lockheed Martin Commercial Electronics
     Tel: 603-885-8432



ATOM RSS1 RSS2