TECHNET Archives

April 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0wIH3a-000BnMC; Fri, 18 Apr 97 12:02 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 1997 13:11:59 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/12121
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"uYTIp3.0.TEN.nawLp"@ipc>
Subject:
FAB: PWB electrical testing
From:
[log in to unmask] (Andy Wolf)
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 23 17:
08:40 1997
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 

Can anyone elaborate on the differences between testing
PWBs to gerber data versus testing to customer-supplied
netlists?

What are the advantages for the customer if he/she provides
a netlist?

Is there a standard (or even commonly used) netlist format?

Thanks in advance,

Andy Wolf
RMS Information Systems
[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2