TECHNET Archives

January 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:52:28 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Decker, Scott Collins" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Decker, Scott Collins" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Jack,

  We have always masked the mounting holes so you don't be CC in them. I don't think I would want the screws/washers, etc. to be clamping down on spongy coatings... :-)





Scott Decker | Senior Engineer, PCB Design Services CID+ | Electronic Systems Center

COLLINS AEROSPACE

3445 S. 5th Street, Suite 170, Phoenix, AZ 85040 U.S.A.

Tel: 602 308 5957  FAX: 602 243 2347

[log in to unmask]  www.collinsaerospace.com



CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message may contain proprietary and/or privileged information of

Collins Aerospace Systems and its affiliated companies. If you are not the intended recipient please 1) do not disclose, copy,

distribute or use this message or its contents, 2) advise the sender by return e-mail, and 3) delete all copies (including all

attachments) from your computer. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson

Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:36 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [External] [TN] Conformal Coating and Unplated Mounting Holes



Is it more common to conformal coat unplated mounting holes?

or designate a clearance diameter on the assembly drawing?


ATOM RSS1 RSS2