It's really not that simple, there are still designs that call out old specs,
and will not change, due to the time and effort it would take to get the
documents rolled and signed off to approve things...welcome to the mil world.

-Steve Gregory-

> It is really very simple; two words, new work.  Both 55110 and 50884 are
> inactive for new designs.  You want to be part of getting the work
> supporting new designs you want to be 31032.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Franklin D Asbell" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:20 AM
> Subject: [TN] MIL-PRF-55110 -vs- MIL-PRF-31032
>
>
> >What are the pro's and con's to transition to MIL-PRF-31032?
> >
> >We're 55110 qualified, lately we've been hearing "chatter" that we should
> >seriously consider 31032...was wondering what all of you thought...
> >
> >Franklin
>


-Steve Gregory-

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------