TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 21 May 1996 15:42:16 +0300
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4240
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"uvrqY2.0.BhC.BXRen"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Eltek Ltd." <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uLqdo-00008hC; Tue, 21 May 96 07:34 CDT
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
From [log in to unmask] Tue May 21 09:
07:08 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)

Subject: Controlled Impedance - Dielectric Constant

I like to know if anyone found that Dielectric Constant, for the same
material (e.g. FR-4),
 might be different when used for calculation of Microstrip or for
calculation of Stripline.

Avner Drory 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2