Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Nov 96 17:06:43 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 4 17: |
11:26 1996 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"WFBRY2.0.WgJ.tRdVo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
X-Priority: |
3 (Normal) |
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vKY6C-0000TtC; Mon, 4 Nov 96 17:06 CST |
From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Everyone:
I would like to know the major reliability issues with Plastic BGA packages
(glob top / molded) and how the end users in the industry are coping with them.
Are the package-die top,bottom delamination / popcorning / ball attach
(compared to lead attach) /
board attach / reworkability / susceptibility to corrosion issues better/worse
when compared to molded surface mount packages because of differences in
materials of construction ?
Is there a jury with a verdict out there ?
I would prefer if the responses are limited to 'reliability issues' only.
Thanks in advance.
Dipak Sengupta
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|