TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 4 Nov 96 17:06:43 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Mon Nov 4 17:
11:26 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7381
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"WFBRY2.0.WgJ.tRdVo"@ipc>
Subject:
X-Priority:
3 (Normal)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vKY6C-0000TtC; Mon, 4 Nov 96 17:06 CST
From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Hello Everyone:

I would like to know the major reliability issues with Plastic BGA packages 
(glob top / molded) and how the end users in the industry are coping with them.

 Are the package-die top,bottom delamination / popcorning / ball attach 
(compared to lead attach) / 
board attach /  reworkability / susceptibility to corrosion issues better/worse 
when compared to molded surface mount packages because of differences in 
materials of construction ?

 Is there a jury with a verdict out there ? 

I would prefer if the responses are limited to 'reliability issues' only.

Thanks in advance.

Dipak Sengupta

[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2