Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:01:07 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was not talking about a solderability issue, but a lack of any wetting to the bottom of the part.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Igoshev. PhD [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 11:35 AM
To: Stadem, Richard D.
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IPC-A-610E, Voids in Thermal exposed pad of QFNs
Hello Richard,
I might be wrong but I don't think one can call a "slit" or a gap between a surface and solder a void. the situation you refer to is rather a solderability issue with a QFN pad, but not voiding one.
And if that is the case then, yes, you are absolutely right it's not detectable by X-ray. however, if it's a solderability issue then it should spread over the affected batch, not just one QFN and it's always the best practice to qualify (by X-sectioning) any new batch of any or at least the most vulnerable components.
--
Best regards,
Vladimir Igoshev. PhD mailto:[log in to unmask]
SENTEC Testing Laboratory Inc.
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|