TECHNET Archives

April 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Greg Munie <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:38:52 +0300
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Surely you mean low sulfide? In fact, mild sulfidisation of silver is
not deleterious to solderability and is conductive, to boot. If it's
black, then that is too much! Which sulfur compounds do you anticipate
it may encounter?

Brian


On 09.04.2014 19:49, Greg Munie wrote:
> Anyone have a working definition of "sulfur free" as it impacts solderability of silver finishes?
>
> As an old chemist I would expect the definition "sulfur free" could have both a concentration and a time a part can be exposed to that concentration before soldering is impacted.
>
> Any thoughts/assistance is appreciated.
>
> Greg Munie Ph.D.
> Director of Design Programs
> +1-847-616-7100 tel
> +1-847-597-2803 direct
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.ipc.org<http://www.ipc.org/>
>
> [cid:[log in to unmask]][http://www.ipc.org/images/shim.gif]<http://www.ipc.org/>
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2