TECHNET Archives

December 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:41:48 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Pete <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Crazing
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Pete <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 lines) 
Back to the microsection validity question - are you sure they aren't trying to say that your microsectioning process caused the crazing, not that it isn't a correct inspection method?

Pete

ATOM RSS1 RSS2