TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X400-Content-Type:
P2-1988 ( 22 )
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
20 Aug 96 11:32:18 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Conversion:
Allowed
Disclose-Recipients:
Prohibited
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
Priority:
non-urgent
From [log in to unmask] Tue Aug 20 13:
24:59 1996
Content-Return:
Allowed
X-Loop:
TO:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> (Return requested)
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5846
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Message-Id:
<05A913219E892001*/c=us/admd=cwmail/prmd=carrier/o=syracuse/ou=ccmail1/s=Parr/g=Aric/@MHS>
X400-Recipients:
non-disclosure;
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ustgJ-0000LBC; Tue, 20 Aug 96 11:29 CDT
X400-Originator:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"iJYiX1.0.eEI.gVU6o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Aric Parr" <[log in to unmask]>
Alternate-Recipient:
Allowed
X400-Received:
by /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 20 Aug 96 11:32:18 -0500 by mta MTAwltk in /c=us/admd=cwmail/; Relayed; 20 Aug 96 11:32:18 -0500
Content-Identifier:
05A913219E892001
X400-Mts-Identifier:
[/c=us/admd=cwmail/; 05A913219E892001-MTAwltk]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)

     yes to both on Matte mask under most circumstances. This is based upon 
     experimental derivation. Matte mask offers less surface area for 
     solderball adhesion in wave, but more area for conformal coat. 
     
     P.S. matte mask is also more difficult to clean than glossy mask.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Assy: LPI Matte vs Gloss and Conformal Coating
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet
Date:    8/20/96 9:39 AM


We are beginning to see more PCB suppliers offering matte finish LPI.  We 
have heard that this finish reduces the adherence of solderballs.  Is this 
true?  If so, at which process, reflow or wave?  What is the science behind 
this lessening of solderballs?
     
2nd Question: We are also starting a project that will require conformal 
coating. Is there a preference in solder mask type/finish? The coatings we 
are leaning towards are silicone-based.
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2