TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:57:32 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (982 bytes) , text/html (2128 bytes)
What you just wrote is a profile. But, more importantly, you said "lead
free". What alloy are you using? This profile looks too cool for lead free.

Bob

=======================
Robert Barr
Manufacturing Engineering
Formation, Inc.
Voice: 856-234-5020 x3035
Fax: 856-234-6679

  -----Original Message-----
  From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dan R. Johnson
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:15 PM
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Subject: [TN] Safe processing window


  A couple of questions for what has become my best engineering resource.

  Management has asked me to provide a re-flow profile for our product, a
surface mount component built on FR-4 with lead free solder. I am reluctant,
I would prefer to generate a "safe processing window" type document. As
manufacturing professionals what do you prefer?

  The window would spec ; max 2  C /sec ramp up, max 60 sec dwell above 180
C, max 220 C peak, and a 2 C/sec max ramp down. Could you live with this?

  Many thanks for your help,
  Dan


ATOM RSS1 RSS2