TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ddsulliv" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 02 Dec 96 16:53:28 cst
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
          Hi Technet:
          
          I am trying to revise our in-house qualification 
          specification for PWB Fabricators.  I am eliminating all 
          references to MIL-P and MIL-STD documents and referring to 
          ANSI/IPC documents.
          
          My question:  Is IPC-RF-245 the document to refer to when 
          specifying Multilayer Flex product performance?  It seems to 
          cover all of the issues that I would consider pertinent.  
          IPC-FC-250A covers single and double sided flex, but does 
          not cover M/L flex.  If IPC-RF-245 (which is a rigid-flex 
          spec) is not the right spec, what is???
          
          Thanks,
          
          Dave Sullivan
          Rockwell Collins, Inc.
          
          [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2