TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Gould <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 18 Nov 1996 19:58:29 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
In your message dated Monday 18, November 1996 you wrote :
> 
> RECENTLY WE FIND INNER LAYER OPEN COMPLAINT IN EIGHT LAYER BOARDS FOR ONE
> PARTICULAR PART NUMBER. ON MICRO SECTIONING WE FIND NO INTER CONNECTION
> BETWEEN HOLE COPPER AND INNER LAYER (SEVENTH LAYER).
>  
>  THE CONSTRUCTION 1,2,7 & 8 ARE SIGNAL LAYERS REST ARE GROUND LAYERS.

Is the separation in the electroless copper layer or are these direct plated 
boards?

If the evidence suggests cracking of the electroless layer then it could be due 
to too fast a plating rate causing coarse grains and brittle deposits which 
crack under thermal cycling. Electroless copper must be a fine grain system and 
the plating rate tightly controlled (typically <2.5 microns in 30 minutes).

The stress of z-axis thermal expansion is greater at the surface layers than in 
the centre due to the laminate expanding more than the copper which is why 
failures will tend to occur on the outermost inner layers.

Good luck,
Paul Gould
EMail [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2