Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 May 2014 09:46:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
1. No, at least for incoming inspection. We use IC when we qualify a new
fabricator and if the fabricator changes their materials or process.
2. IPC mostly. Our own internal database (Doug's head) occasionally.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Richard Kraszewski <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I actually sent this out on May 16th, but never got a single response.
> Hoping that was not due to lack of interest, but rather due to the TechNet
> being down. Hence, I think I'll try this one more time.
>
> I am hoping to run an informal " min straw poll " here.
>
> Questions stated are as follows:
>
>
> 1. "Is your organization testing incoming PCB cleanliness via
> ion- chromatography? Replies such as "YES" or "NO" will
> suffice, but more detailed explanations are also acceptable.
>
>
>
> 2. " If testing via IC, do you use IPC -5704 Table 4.1 limits or
> other? Replies such as "
> IPC" or "other" will suffice, but more detailed explanations are also
> acceptable.
>
> What's in it for you? I will summarize and post the results after a
> few days of replies.
>
> Rich Kraszewski
> Senior Process Engineer
> Plexus
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
--
Doug Pauls
Principal Materials and Process Engineer
Rockwell Collins
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|